Pause. The objection was that you were putting - excuse me, let's start again. The objection, and there's a validity in the objection, was that he is referring to NPFL forcing civilians to work. You're moving on now to a situation involving Sam Bockarie, by implication the RUF. Are you asking him whether he should have mentioned the RUF or are you moving into a completely new dimension that doesn't refer to the record of interview?