Mr Bangura, as I recall the Defence exhibit resembled in content and date and time frame another handwritten document that was never exhibited by either party. I don't recall the Chamber ruling that the Defence exhibit fell within the same time frame as the Prosecution exhibits per se. I don't recall that at all. But I do recall that there was a handwritten document within the same tab number where exhibit D-13 came from that resembled in content the typed exhibit D-13. That's what I recall. Now that handwritten document was never tendered by either party in evidence.