Now you say in paragraph 3 of your motion that witnesses of fact are subdivided into three other categories; that is victims of sexual assault, child witnesses and insider witnesses. Then in paragraph 4 you say that the pseudonyms of group 1 witnesses are listed in annex B. Now the group 1 witnesses are the witnesses that fall into those three categories. You don't say there is a fourth category of witnesses of fact. There are only three categories and the witnesses that fall into those three categories you say are contained in annex A. But what you're saying to the Court is, yes, they are, but there are more witnesses that we didn't mention that fall as witnesses of fact but outside those three categories. Is that what you're saying?