Thank you very much.

I responded by saying that the documentary information, log books, were not directly under my control, but that had access to monitor communication. In the past I made it explicit over and again that there was a confusion and immediately after Mohamed Tarawalli got missing in action I was instructed ...

Thank you.

No, not outside the Court. This coding system was demonstrated in the Court and everything was made clear that there are frequencies that authorities can communicate without --

You asked me to demonstrate and to tell the Court --

The interview that was done in this particular court. You asked me to demonstrate - to talk about the code system, the frequency code, to the entire court and that was demonstrated and there was a difference between the operator's code, the nickname, et cetera, and the code frequencies which ...

In the open interview I was asked by the Prosecution counsel to demonstrate the sequence of communication in respect of codes and specific frequencies. That I demonstrated and everybody listened. I made it very explicit that authorities' communication only need to be safeguarded by a specific code - I mean specific ...

What I am trying to say is that there are communications that do not need codes. I previously told the counsel that verbal communications were done by generals on a specific frequency. That communication only needed to be secured by a frequency and not by codes. That had been my ...

Yes. The radio message was sent to Baidu, recorded. Upon the arrival of the generals in Baidu, Mr Charles Taylor spoke to them and each and every one of them had a specific task. Oliver Varney was tasked to ensure that all the NPFL fighters in Kailahun assembled and this ...

Yes. I was trying to make counsel understand that the message for the evacuation of the NPFL fighting forces was first transmitted from Charles Taylor's operator to the radio station in Baidu. Upon the arrival of the generals, who were superceded by Mr Anthony Menquenagbeh, Charles Taylor spoke to ...

Yes.

What I am trying to explain is that in 1991 I never had access to communicate, or I was not an operator directly, but I had access to information because I was operating with colleagues who gave me detailed information about the operation that was going on and I was ...

Yes, indeed.

What I am trying to say is that the past interview conducted by investigators and the lawyer, while in Sierra Leone, in 2003 and 2007 I was interviewed and I was answering by means of questions and the information was taken down, as compared to the interview in The Hague ...

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes, I remember it, but my statement, the two statements do not contradict each other. What I can precisely remember, the question was posed to me how did I get to know the detail about the house as NPFL - as an NPFL guesthouse and I said that Rashid Foday who ...

Yes, I said it.

Yes.

Pardon me, please?

Yes.

Yes.

He was there, yes.

Yes, indeed.

What I'm trying to say is that I was speaking with the investigator, but I had a lot of reservation in my information based on this - on Martin Moinama's experience. It was - this was overemphasised to the investigator and a lawyer that I went through even up to ...

The ex-combatants who were with me in prison, I was afraid for them not to get the source of my information that I was giving to the Special Court. There was every possibility that I could be poisoned or if there was any turmoil in the country I could be ...

I was afraid for my security because I was in prison and during that time anything can happen as it happened in the case of Martin Moinama.

Definitely, yes.

Number one, with reference to Martin Moinama's death, that had been the number one objection that I made to the Special Court when they visited me in the year 2003. I said that I was the communication officer of the RUF and that I had information to give to ...

Yes.

Good morning, sir.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

I believe so, yes.

Yes, ma'am.

Yes, ma'am.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.