Yes. As regards MFI-2 through to 4, I've made a note of the individual paragraphs that have been referred to and I would ask that those be moved into evidence. However, if your Honours are of the view that it's better that the entire statements are admitted into ...

Madam President, I don't have any further questions for the witness. I haven't, however, asked for the three statements that I've referred to to be marked for identification yet and I would ask that they be marked for identification.

You switched allegiances to Mr Taylor, didn't you, Mr Witness?

Could we look please at the transcript from Friday, 25 June 2010 at page 43532 and I'm going to be at line 20, please. Now, line 20 after "counter-accusations" it says here you said:

"And I was made to understand from one - from my NPFL commander called Senegalese."

So ...

Wasn't he your NPFL commander?

He was your commander, wasn't he?

Your previous commander was Senegalese, wasn't it?

And, having a decade of experience as a fighter, it's right, isn't it, that you then joined Charles Taylor's former forces in the Ivory Coast, didn't you?

Now, when the war had finished in Liberia there was another war that was ongoing in the Ivory Coast, correct?

And in fact you told us on the last occasion that you said to Senegalese that every other promises that these people made to us on the LURD side, never one of them materialised. Do you recall saying that on Friday?

And you didn't receive any job or position at all following your membership and loyalty to LURD, correct?

So you personally didn't receive a job in the transitional government?

I don't know if it's possible just to put the arm down on the projector, please:

Did you receive a job in the transitional government?

And what was that?

But you personally as a fighter received nothing?

When the war ended members of LURD received jobs in the transitional government?

The LURD won the war in Liberia, didn't they?

And it's right, isn't it, that the LURD won the war in Liberia?

And then with the LURD?

Then with Special Forces?

And you fought first with ULIMO?

Mr Witness, you have been a fighter for about a decade, haven't you?

Well, your words, Mr Witness, is this:

"What Charles Taylor is accused of, we were also doing it on the other side here."

So that's exactly what you're saying, isn't it?

I haven't finished putting the question yet. What you are saying in that sentence is that Charles Taylor is responsible for those crimes but you and the forces that you were fighting for also did the same, isn't it?

And what you are saying in that sentence --

Now, moving on through that paragraph, at the very last sentence you say:

"What Charles Taylor is accused of we were also doing it on the other side here with ULIMO, ECOMOG, et cetera."

Mr Witness, you appreciate, don't you, that Mr Taylor is accused of responsibility for crimes ...

What about Senegalese who you mentioned last time? Was it Senegalese who also informed you that the RUF had not been with Charles Taylor for many years?

And, if that's the case, then who informed you or you Special Forces that the RUF had not been with Charles Taylor for many years?

I'll repeat myself again. In that sentence you said:

"Now we learn that the RUF had not been with Charles Taylor for many years."

When you said "we", who are you referring to?

Now, can you look please at paragraph 49. You said there to your Defence lawyers:

"Charles Taylor had been the bad guy all of these years. Now we learn that RUF had not been with Charles Taylor for many years."

Mr Witness, when you said there "now we learn", when ...

So you're friends and you talk lengthy but you are unable to help us with the name?

Given that you became a friend of Senegalese, can you tell us, please, what is the real name of Senegalese?

You also explained to the Court that you became a friend of - with Senegalese and that you used to talk lengthy. Do you recall saying that?

So turning to the last page, which is page 15, we were looking on the last occasion at the final paragraphs and that's paragraph 48 and 49. In respect to paragraph 48 I had asked you who had made you understand better what was happening from Charles Taylor's ...

I was moving to the second witness statement that we were looking at at the end of the last session and that's the statement dated 21 October 2009, please:

Mr Witness, at the end of Friday's proceedings we were looking for the final time - I should ask for the document to be marked for identification, please, before I do move to that.

Mr Witness, when you said at the very start of these proceedings a moment ago that you had never received any payments or any compensation from the Court, that was not the truth, was it?

So is your evidence, "No, I never received that amount of money"?

And that figure represents, and I appreciate not necessarily money that was physically put in your hands in relation to all of those items, but money that was given to compensate you or given to you in respect to those items. Do you dispute that you've received money to ...

And the figure there is 2,772,000 leones?

Cast your eye down to the total figure. Do you see where it says "total" on that page?

Cast your eye down to the total figure?

Now, Mr Witness, you've received in total 2,772,000 leones whilst you've been a witness in this case, haven't you?

Finally there's a figure for accommodation of 360,000 leones. Did you receive that or not?

You are disputing that you received anything called attendance allowance. Is that correct?

I'll put that last question again:

You are disputing you received anything called attendance allowance. Is that right?

So you are saying the Witness and Victims Service made up this figure?

That's not the truth, is it?